翻訳と辞書 ・ Lipka, Złotów County ・ Lipka, Łódź Voivodeship ・ Lipke Holthuis ・ Lipkeidae ・ Lipki ・ Lipki Małe ・ Lipki Wielkie ・ Lipki, Chojnice County ・ Lipki, Kireyevsky District, Tula Oblast ・ Lipki, Malbork County ・ Lipki, Opole Voivodeship ・ Lipki, Russia ・ Lipki, West Pomeranian Voivodeship ・ Lipki, Łódź Voivodeship ・ Lipkin ・ Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd ・ Lipkovo ・ Lipkovo Municipality ・ Lipkowo ・ Lipków ・ LIPL ・ Liplas ・ Lipliūnai ・ Lipljan ・ Liplje ・ Liplje (Ljig) ・ Liplje camp ・ Liplje Monastery ・ Liplje, Kamnik ・ Liplje, Postojna
|
|
Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd : ウィキペディア英語版 | Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd
is a foundational English unjust enrichment case. The House of Lords unanimously established that the basis of an action for money had and received is the principle of unjust enrichment, and that an award of restitution is subject to a defence of change of position. This secured unjust enrichment English law as the third pillar of the law of obligations, along with contract and tort. ==Facts== Norman Barry Cass was a partner in a solicitors' firm called Lipkin Gorman. He was an authorised signatory at the firm’s Lloyds Bank account. He took out £220,000 and used it for gambling at the Playboy Club, 45 Park Lane, London which was owned by Karpnale Ltd. Between March and November 1980, the club won £154,695 of the stolen money (the rest paid back to Mr Cass in ‘winnings’). Mr Cass fled to Israel, but was brought back and sentenced to three years prison for theft in 1984. Lipkin Gorman sued the club for return of the stolen money. At the time, gambling contracts were contrary to public policy, and therefore void under the Gaming Act 1845 section 18. Alliott J in the High Court, and then the Court of Appeal (May LJ and Parker LJ, but Nicholls LJ dissenting), dismissed Lipkin Gorman's claims.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|